Summary of report contentHealthwatch Hartlepool conducted an Enter and View visit in November 2018 of the Respiratory Medicine Ward in University Hospital of North Tees. Observations and interviews were used to gather feedback from 5 staff members and 18 patients. Observations made by the Enter and View representatives included that the ward environment was untidy and facilities were unclean such as showers and toilets. Patients reported that the food was good but was not hot and that water jugs were available and regularly topped up. There was mixed feedback regarding privacy and dignity as patients reported that staff were very busy and not always offering a quick response. However, the majority of patients stated that they were happy with their overall care and treatment. Patients reported that the ward was generally clean but the majority stated that bathroom facilities were unclean. Staff reported that staffing levels and morale were low due to a change in management. They told the Healthwatch representatives that the ward is extremely busy and they experience a large volume of work pressure. The training opportunities are on-going and carried out as required. Healthwatch Hartlepool have made a number of recommendations including that the corridors and utility rooms need to be tidied and the hygiene and cleaning of bathroom facilities must be urgently addressed with regular checking and signing of the check sheets. The service provider provided a response to the recommendations and has answered the questions posed by the Enter and View Representatives. An action plan has been suggested.
Would you like to look at:
Enter and view: University Hospital of North Tees, Ward 24
Date of publication
Tuesday, 22 January, 2019
Date evidence capture began
Friday, 16 November, 2018
Date evidence capture finished
Friday, 16 November, 2018
Type of report
Enter and view
Building and facilities
Cleanliness hygiene and infection control
Communication between staff and patients
Food and nutrition
Health and safety
Quality of care
Quality of catering
Quality of staffing
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Healthwatch reference number
Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation?
Primary research method used
How was the information collected?
Visit to provider
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
Secondary care services
Conditions or diseases
Number of people who shared their views
All people 18 and over
Specific ethnicity if known
Does the information include public's views?
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views?
Does the information include staff's views?
Types of health and care professionals engaged
Care / support workers
Does the information include other people's views?
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views?
Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report?
Does the information contain a response from a provider?
Yes action has been taken or promised
Is there evidence of impact in the report?
Is there evidence of impact external to the report?
What type of impact was determined?