Services in Havering for people who have a visual impairment: a review

Download (PDF 474KB)

Summary of report content

This report on Eye Services responds to the concerns expressed by residents, professional staff and voluntary organisations about the service model, the facilities, the level of support and, above all, the disjointed processes that service users experience. The number of organisations involved in this chain of care has surprised us. This contributes to the inability to be able to clearly describe the Care Pathways, which may result in residents who are blind or partially sighted being without the physical and health and wellbeing support they require. In this report we look at the journey patients make from attending their optician for routine eye tests and glasses, to being referred to the hospital services at Barking Havering and Redbridge University Trust (BHRUT) for more complex care, to those residents who find themselves with an eye condition that requires them to register a Certificate of Visual Impairment (CVI) with the London Borough of Havering (LBH), and the support available to help our residents and their families to adjust their lives for the long term. The report indicates that a lot more could be done to improve the experience of patients, especially the provision of an Eye Clinic Liaison Officer (ECLO) at BHRUT, which we have been advised, continues to be delayed despite the support and offer of funding from the Pocklington Trust, the Royal National Institute for Blind People and the continued lobbying of the local Sight Action Group. There is information and guidance available from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists for all hospital medical staff, comprehensive advice available for everyone from the RNIB, supportive and responsive local services from the London Borough of Havering, advice and information from CarePoint and the voluntary sector such as Sight Action and Partially Sighted Havering. Healthwatch Havering view is that, unless there is a more comprehensive understanding of the individual parts of the entire process of care needed in eye services and how they are interconnected, then we may only address the symptoms of an inadequate service model. However, the commitment shown from organisations to address this problem indicates that it is possible to achieve a more holistic model of care for our residents.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Services in Havering for people who have a visual impairment: a review
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Havering
Date of publication 
Friday, 1 June, 2018
Date evidence capture began 
Friday, 1 June, 2018
Date evidence capture finished 
Friday, 1 June, 2018
Type of report 
Enter and view
Key themes 
Access
Building and facilities
Communication between staff and patients
Information providing
Quality of appointment
Quality of care
Quality of staffing
Quality of treatment
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Healthwatch reference number 
Rep-7119

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
What type of organisation requested the work 
N/A
If this work has been done in partnership, who is the partner? 
Primary research method used 
User stories
How was the information collected? 
Research
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Primary care services 
Optometry services

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
Not known
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
Not known
Ethnicity 
Not known
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
No
Does the information include staff's views? 
No
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
N/A
Does the information include other people's views? 
No
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
Yes
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
Yes
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
No
What type of impact was determined? 
Implied Impact

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.