STP questions and answers, Nottingham

Download (PDF 339KB)
You voted 'Yes'.

Summary of report content

Responses were gathered through face to face engagement, an online question on the website, through a local optician handing out postcards and a link to the survey on partner mailing lists. There were 318 responses collected. 153 from residents of Nottinghamshire and 153 from Nottingham City residents. 12 people did not provide this information or were out of area. 106 people said they had heard of the Sustainability and Transformation Plan. Respondents felt that the STP was a good opportunity to provided joined dup care and centralised planning and delivery. Negative comments were made about another ‘cost-cutting’ service and thought ‘too ambitious to be successful’.

Would you like to look at:

Report 
PDF icon 20170701_Nottingham_STP questions and answers.pdf

General details

Report title 
STP questions and answers, Nottingham
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Nottinghamshire
Date of publication 
Tuesday, 6 June, 2017
Date evidence capture began 
Friday, 5 May, 2017
Date evidence capture finished 
Tuesday, 6 June, 2017
Type of report 
Other
Key themes 
Service closure
Healthwatch reference number 
Rep-6521

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
What type of organisation requested the work 
N/A
Primary research method used 
Survey
User stories
How was the information collected? 
Engagement Event
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
318
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
All
Ethnicity 
All
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Not known
Does the information include staff's views? 
Not known
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
N/A
Does the information include other people's views? 
Yes
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
No
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
No
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
Not known
What type of impact was determined? 
Tangible Impact (cost related)

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.