iCope Kingston service user review report

Download (PDF 553KB)

Summary of report content

In March 2018, the Healthwatch Kingston upon Thames Mental Health Task Group began to undertake a service user review of the iCope Kingston Psychological Therapies Service which is available for people registered with a GP in the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames. They spoke to 49 people via a survey and interviews.

When therapy worked well, participants were delighted with the iCope Kingston service, the treatment, the choice of therapist and the new skills that they have acquired to cope and stay calm. Kindness, empathy, and non-judgemental were qualities found to be supportive, professional, and reassuring and especially when individual needs were taken into consideration.

Respondents suggested that literature, guidance, and advice would be very useful for those providing support for loved ones suffering from depression or anxiety. Participants felt that some form of interim support between the initial iCope assessment and first appointment would be useful. People felt that more service provision is needed to support people with ongoing challenges whist they wait for an appointment.

Participants raised concerns about administrative staff not being kind enough, the environment not being friendly enough and some clinicians not being experienced enough. The time from assessment to treatment was mixed, it ranged from, just right for some people’s circumstances, but too lengthy for others.

Reminders for appointments were reassuring as was information provision for the waiting period, the kind of therapy and different treatment options available.

Failure to call back at an appointed time and failure to respond to answering machine messages were unacceptable. In seeking to communicate with the service people found access difficult and this was inhibiting. People experienced inflexibility when people’s personal commitments clashed with appointment schedules, even when they clashed with other medical appointments, hospital attendance and school runs, and people felt they were being treated as difficult.

Some types of therapy were thought of as unsuitable by participants, and others were unavailable. Participants sensed there to be inadequate provision within the iCope Kingston service, and felt the service appeared overwhelmed and probably underfunded.

Participants felt the treatment built up their confidence levels, to learn structure, to discover what they are doing right so they can improve upon it, to learn different ways of thinking, to set goals and to establish a positive mind-set which helps them to stay calm and to reduce their depression and anxiety levels. This service has had a positive impact on many peoples’ lives, and many felt privileged to have received treatment and help. However, reports were raised about administrative staff not being kind enough, the environment not being friendly enough and some clinicians not seeming experienced enough.

The report contains nine recommendations and a response from the provider.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
iCope Kingston service user review report
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Kingston upon Thames
Date of publication 
Wednesday, 9 March, 2022
Date evidence capture began 
Thursday, 1 March, 2018
Date evidence capture finished 
Wednesday, 31 October, 2029
Key themes 
Access
Administration
Communication between staff and patients
Information providing
Quality of care
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Staff attitudes
Support
Waiting times and lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
Primary research method used 
Survey
Unstructured Interview
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Secondary care services 
Counselling/improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT)
Mental health services 
Community mental health team (CMHT)

Details about conditions and diseases

Types of disabilities 
Mental health
Types of long term conditions 
Mental health condition
What type of pregnancy or maternity themes are included in the report 
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
49
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
Not known
Ethnicity 
Not known
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
No
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
Yes
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
Yes action has been taken or promised
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
Yes
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
Not known
What type of impact was determined? 
Implied Impact

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.