Experiences of Dementia and Memory Support Services in North Tyneside

Download (PDF 263KB)
You voted 'No'.

Summary of report content

Healthwatch North Tyneside wanted to further understand the key issues older people experience when using services for their mental health. Between August 2019 and January 2020 they spoke to 61 people about their experiences of memory and dementia services for older people. They have also received feedback through our general engagement activity from nine people and spoke with a range of stakeholders and staff about their experiences of working within these services.

People often experienced long waits for referrals to memory clinics as GPs didn’t spot the signs of dementia. Once they had been referred, an appointment was swiftly made.  Family and carers sometimes felt that their insights were not taken on board by medical professionals.

People were very positive about their experiences at the memory clinic they attended. People found the follow up sessions provided by the Memory Clinic helpful but some commented that the time-limited nature of these wasn’t enough. Following diagnosis, the main issue that patients, carers and family told us about was the lack of information and support available and signposted to.

People found the Admiral Nursing service “invaluable”. It emerged that not everyone had access to the Admiral Nurse service or knew it existed and people were unclear why some had received and benefited from the Admiral Nurse service and others had not.

Awareness of what support was available was often low until a person joined a support group, meaning people often only heard about the support groups through word of mouth. Another key barrier to accessing support for several people was the lack of transport options to get to a support group and the financial cost of attending the groups which incurred a cost.

Although GPs are a key step in the process of accessing specialist support, once referral has taken place some people had very little contact with their GP about their continuing health and care needs.   People felt they were left to get on with it and not being clear who to go to for advice or if someone’s needs changed.

There were mixed experiences about people getting professional advice as their condition deteriorates. People said that when they were discharged from the memory clinic, they needed to go to their GP to be referred back to the memory clinic, unless they have maintained a relationship with the memory clinic.

Most people felt that they had limited interaction with statutory adult social care services. People who had had contact with a social worker said that their main activity was often just received visits to set up a care package.

A number of people discussed positive experiences of the care received by their care or nursing home. People had various experiences of using health services for non-dementia related conditions and issues. Most people felt that hospital treatment was poor due to lack of awareness and knowledge about the needs of someone with dementia.

The main issue carers and staff described was the difficulty in meeting the requirements to make a referral into the older people’s mental health team – this included a urine sample and blood sample which was often impossible to retrieve from service-users.

There were positive experiences of carers feeling like partners in care - “me and the care home are in partnership” - and poor experiences of carers’ views and experiences being ignored by professionals. This meant that sometimes the carers’ fear of making things worse acted as a barrier to advocating and navigating services. A key concern for carers was around crisis planning which was often not discussed or given information on by health and care professionals.

The report contains 19 recommendations to address the issues raised in the report.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Experiences of Dementia and Memory Support Services in North Tyneside
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch North Tyneside
Date of publication 
Friday, 30 April, 2021
Date evidence capture began 
Thursday, 1 August, 2019
Date evidence capture finished 
Friday, 31 January, 2020
Key themes 
Communication between staff and patients
Continuity of care
Holistic support
Information providing
Integration of services
Lifestyle and wellbeing
Quality of care
Referrals
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Staff attitudes
Waiting times and lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
Primary research method used 
Structured interview
User stories
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Primary care services 
GP practice
Secondary care services 
Dementia
Mental health services 
Older peoples mental health community service
Social care services 
Adult social care
Nursing care home
Residential care home

Details about conditions and diseases

Types of disabilities 
Learning or understanding or concentrating
Memory
Types of long term conditions 
Alzheimer’s disease or dementia
What type of pregnancy or maternity themes are included in the report 
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
70
Age group 
18-24 years
25-64 years
65-85 years
85 +
Gender 
Female
Male
Ethnicity 
White
Specific ethnicity if known 
English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
Yes
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
Care / support workers
Doctors
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
Yes
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
No
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
Not known

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.