Experiences Carers’ Breaks and Respite Provision in Coventry

Download (PDF 582KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Coventry identified from an annual national survey carried out to gather feedback from family carers to provide information to local authorities which have responsibility for respite care/carer support that there was a deterioration in satisfaction rates but a lack of detail as to why. They therefore decided to work with Coventry City Council to gather views about respite care/carers breaks in order to understand the reason(s) for this. Healthwatch Coventry carried out a survey and undertook enter and view visits to two residential respite care providers.  There were 18 responses to the survey.

The survey and visits provide information about the experiences of both family carers and the cared for who access respite services. Both identified many positive aspects in their experiences of services.

Most family carers indicated that the respite received supported them to continue in their caring role by providing a break or enabling them to do other things they needed to do. Some carers indicated that more respite hours would be beneficial. Most people thought that the respite care they experienced meets the needs of the person who was cared for. Carers flagged that they need to book respite care ahead, some saw this as a positive but for others there were some issues around availability of/finding the right provision.

It was less clear if current provision could accommodate needs which came up quickly or in emergency situations of need. The assessment process was not positive for some as they did not feel needs had been taken on board/addressed and an assessment had not been done for some time.

The skills and approaches of staff delivering respite care, in whatever setting, are very important. The two facilities we visited demonstrated a strong approach to staff training. However if there were staff vacancies or absence this could impact on delivery.

Family carers highlighted a desire for more information and some issues around making sure information about circumstances/needs is up to date, as well as some issues in how services communicated with each other. Some simple steps could be taken to enhance and collate the feedback gathered from those experiencing services.  For example, Facebook or an online feedback form could be used by family carers.

Recommendations

The City Council should:

  1. review access to respite services in relation to:
  • Whether the provision available matches the profile of users
  • How effectively urgent respite needs are being met
  1. Review effectiveness of or set up a system for updating on any changes that may impact on individual care plans and support required as they occur.

All stakeholders (social services, respite care providers, other professionals) should ensure they pass on information relating to any changes that may occur.

Respite care facilities should ensure there is a process for providing feedback to family carers after respite.

There should be a clear and universal feedback mechanism about experiences of respite care services and replacement care (however it is delivered) to gather feedback as people use services. Use of online routes for family carers to use should be explored alongside traditional methods.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Experiences Carers’ Breaks and Respite Provision in Coventry
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Coventry
Date of publication 
Monday, 28 October, 2019
Date evidence capture began 
Tuesday, 1 January, 2019
Date evidence capture finished 
Monday, 25 March, 2019
Type of report 
Report
Key themes 
Access
Engagement
Health inequalities
Holistic support
Quality of care
Other information of note about this report 
Carers
Healthwatch reference number 
Rep-4978

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
Primary research method used 
Survey
How was the information collected? 
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
Announced

Details of health and care services included in the report

Social care services 
Respite care

Details about conditions and diseases

Types of disabilities 
Learning or understanding or concentrating
Other
Types of long term conditions 
Learning disability
What type of pregnancy or maternity themes are included in the report 
N/A

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
25
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
All
Ethnicity 
Not known
Specific ethnicity if known 
All
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
Yes
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
Care / support workers
Does the information include other people's views? 
No
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.