Experience of hospital discharge at whittington urgent care centre

Download (PDF 824KB)

Summary of report content

This report and the research which informed its findings was done as part of a programme of engagement on the North London Partners Urgent and Emergency Care programme. North London Partners is the sustainability and transformation partnership for North London, formed of health and care organisations from the five London boroughs of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Haringey and Islington. The five local Healthwatch in the North London area are collaborating to promote citizen engagement in the work of the partnership. This includes an extensive programme of engagement on Urgent and Emergency Care, led by Healthwatch Camden. Healthwatch spoke to three men and six women, six of who were patients, and three family carers speaking on behalf of patients. In this report they are all described as family members, to differentiate from paid carers. The age range of patients was 64 to 93, with most being in their seventies or eighties. The theme of the interviews were in relation to the information they were given before discharge,; if they had a care plan; whether they felt sufficiently involved in the care plan; whether they felt supported when they back at home; anything that could have been done better.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Experience of hospital discharge at whittington urgent care centre
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Barnet
Healthwatch Camden
Healthwatch Enfield
Healthwatch Haringey
Healthwatch Islington
Date of publication 
Friday, 1 December, 2017
Date evidence capture began 
Friday, 1 December, 2017
Date evidence capture finished 
Friday, 1 December, 2017
Type of report 
Report
Key themes 
Discharge
Healthwatch reference number 
Rep-7070

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
What type of organisation requested the work 
N/A
Primary research method used 
Structured interview
How was the information collected? 
Survey
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Secondary care services 
Acute services with overnight beds
Acute services without overnight beds / listed acute services with or without overnight beds

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
12
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
Not known
Ethnicity 
Not known
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
No
Does the information include staff's views? 
No
Does the information include other people's views? 
No
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
No
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
No
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
No

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.