The experience of GP services

Download (PDF 2.77MB)

Summary of report content

This report is based on the experience of 773 people. Feedback has been obtained from a variety of sources, including general outreach and comments posted online (NHS, Care Opinion and social media).

Experiences indicate most people received good quality, compassionate treatment and care, and felt supported and involved. However, experiences suggest people would like greater levels of communication and support. Ability to book appointments, administration, telephones and waiting lists are cited as issues.

Overall sentiment is 51% positive, 47% negative and 2% neutral.

The ability to obtain timely appointments is a problem for many, with accounts of congested telephone lines and waits of days (or more) to see a clinician. Choice is also an issue, with some patients not comfortable with, or able to undertake remote appointments.

Over 120 people left negative feedback about administration, with sentiment clearly negative overall. People would also like greater levels of communication and support from administrative staff, comments suggest.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
The experience of GP services
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Harrow
Date of publication 
Thursday, 4 November, 2021
Date evidence capture began 
Thursday, 1 October, 2020
Date evidence capture finished 
Thursday, 30 September, 2021
Key themes 
Access
Administration
Booking appointments
Cancellation
Car parking access
Car parking charges
Communication between staff and patients
Information providing
Medication
Quality of care
Referrals
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Staff attitudes
Staff levels
Staff training
Support
Waiting time to be seen once arrived at appointment
Waiting times and lists for treatment

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
What type of organisation requested the work 
N/A
If this work has been done in partnership, who is the partner? 
None
Primary research method used 
Observation
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Primary care services 
GP practice

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
773
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
Not known
Ethnicity 
Not known
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
No
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
N/A
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
No
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
Not applicable
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
No
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
No

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.