Digital Inclusion Report

Download (PDF 491KB)

Summary of report content

Healthwatch Bexley decided to undertake further research into digital inclusion after a survey on access to health and social care via the pandemic indicated that virtual appointments were difficult for some people.  They engaged with over 185 residents via a survey, focus groups and engaging with charity and community group leaders.

Most of those who responded to Healthwatch Bexley’s online survey had some degree of knowledge and understanding of using digital technology. The majority had access to the internet, an email address and home Wi-Fi. However, for some, this was only used sometimes in a limited way to talk to friends and family. Community groups and charities reported that certain groups such as the elderly, young people and some ethnic minorities were more likely to be digitally excluded. This was due to not being able to afford Wi-Fi or the equipment needed, having English as an additional language, or not having the appropriate, knowledge, ability, training or confidence to get online.

Twelve percent of survey respondents didn’t feel confident in using the internet.  Nearly two thirds said they would be happy to use the internet more if they had additional training.

. Reasons for not using the internet included not feeling confident or trusting it, feeling too old to learn, not being able to for health reasons such as having Parkinson’s Disease or Dementia, or having a fear of being scammed. Isolation and loneliness have increased for many people during the pandemic, not just the elderly but young people who cannot meet with friends and family.

Virtual platforms to contact friends and family were popular amongst those with digital access, with more than three quarters using face to face platforms such as Zoom, Skype or Facetime regularly. Over four in five said that due to the government lockdown restrictions, they were using these virtual platforms more than before as a way of seeing loved ones.

During the pandemic, GP Practices have been operating a total triage system to keep both staff and patients safe from Covid-19. GP Practices have remained open, but Bexley residents have been encouraged when possible, to book appointments online using an online triage tool, even when ringing for an appointment. Just under a third were unable to complete the form. The reasons given were that they didn’t understand the form and that it asked too many questions that did not seem relevant or appropriate to their concern.

Training for those who have internet access, but limited knowledge and skills may help to build confidence and trust, encouraging people to use online triage services. Primary Care needs to ensure that online triage systems are easy to understand.

For those without digital access, the cost of buying equipment was a factor. Healthwatch Bexley heard that some charities run equipment loan schemes or provide a digital suite for their members so they can use the digital services they offer without the cost of buying equipment. Some residents who used libraries to access online services found that they had become digitally excluded whilst libraries closed during the pandemic.

The report has five recommendations covering funding for a digital skills training programme and how virtual appointments should be provided.

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Digital Inclusion Report
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Bexley
Date of publication 
Tuesday, 13 April, 2021
Date evidence capture began 
Monday, 23 March, 2020
Date evidence capture finished 
Thursday, 31 December, 2020
Key themes 
Access
Booking appointments
Communication between staff and patients
Digitalisation of services
Interpreters
Service delivery organisation and staffing

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
No
Primary research method used 
Engagement event
Focus group
Survey
User stories
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Primary care services 
GP practice
Secondary care services 
Outpatients

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
185
Age group 
Not known
Gender 
Not known
Ethnicity 
Not known
Sexual orientation 
Not known
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
Not known
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
Yes
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
No
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
Not known

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.