Digital Health and care

Download (PDF 5.19MB)

Summary of report content

The Suffolk and North East Essex ICS commissioned Healthwatch Suffolk and Healthwatch Essex to complete research with local communities to understand how people have felt about these changes. This report outlines the findings of the research conducted by Healthwatch Suffolk.  They devised surveys for the public and healthcare professionals to understand their experiences.  This was followed up by conversations with people.

Participants highlighted that digital and remote access had kept health and care services open during the pandemic, in a safe way. Participants also said that digital services could be effective for routine care, follow-up and triage, as well as for administrative functions like booking appointments or accessing health records. Finally, some participants acknowledged the benefits of not having to travel to appointments.

Most health, care and VCSE professionals consider that digital services are effective, although around a third did not agree with this statement. In their qualitative responses, many professionals noted the service benefits of digital care delivery. This included that staff are more productive and that they can treat and support more people. Staff have also commented that digital provision has enabled them to continue to offer safe support in spite of pandemic restrictions and lockdowns.

Alongside the benefits, this research identified many examples where people have been unable to access digital care because they are excluded to some extent. It was common for carers, family members, friends and VCSE professionals to report these experiences on behalf of individuals, however, experiences from people who have little or no digital skills or access, were also captured in both phase one and two of this research. Common reasons for digital exclusion included:

  • Not having access to digital technology
  • Lacking the necessary skills or confidence to use digital
  • Not wanting to use digital technology to access health and care
  • Having health or accessibility needs that make digital access difficult or not possible
  • Security and trust

Investment in digital inclusion initiatives will help but is unlikely to fully address some of the issues people have described in this research.

Equipment, and access to the right technology, has also been an important consideration for professionals who responded to the phase one survey. Some felt their ability to provide effective care had been limited by the quality and availability of appropriate tools and also inadequate digital infrastructure (e.g. connectivity when working remotely in rural areas). This included systems becoming frozen mid-appointment, down time on servers and connection, and insufficient laptops (with web cam functionality) to meet the demand for video-based services. The current significant variations in systems, websites and approaches are unhelpful to those seeking to learn how to make the most of digital care (this applies to both users of services and those providing care).

The report concludes with a set of guiding principles for the design of digital NHS and social care services.  These are:

  • Make it a choice
  • Keep things accessible
  • Signpost for inclusion
  • Right tool for the right occasion
  • Communicate change
  • Simple websites
  • Support carers
  • Have help on hand
  • Security
  • Personalise care
  • Co-production

Would you like to look at:

General details

Report title 
Digital Health and care
Local Healthwatch 
Healthwatch Suffolk
Date of publication 
Friday, 21 May, 2021
Key themes 
Access
Communication between staff and patients
Digitalisation of services
Holistic support
Information providing
Quality of appointment
Service delivery organisation and staffing
Staff attitudes
Staff training

Methodology and approach

Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation? 
Yes
What type of organisation requested the work 
Other (please specify)
If this work has been done in partnership, who is the partner? 
Suffolk and North East Essex ICS
Primary research method used 
Engagement event
Focus group
Structured interview
Survey
User stories
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced? 
N/A

Details of health and care services included in the report

Primary care services 
GP practice
Secondary care services 
Outpatients
Mental health services 
Community mental health team (CMHT)
Social care services 
Adult social care

Details of people who shared their views

Number of people who shared their views 
728
Age group 
All people 18 and over
Gender 
All
Ethnicity 
All
Sexual orientation 
Bisexual
Heterosexual
Homosexual
Does the information include public's views? 
Yes
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views? 
Yes
Does the information include staff's views? 
Yes
Types of health and care professionals engaged 
All care professionals
What was the main sentiment of the people who shared their views? 
Mixed

Outcomes and impact

Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report? 
Yes
Does the information contain a response from a provider? 
No
Is there evidence of impact in the report? 
Yes
Is there evidence of impact external to the report? 
Not known
What type of impact was determined? 
Implied Impact

Network Impact
Relationships that exist locally, regionally, nationally have benefited from the work undertaken in the report
 
Implied Impact
Where it is implied that change may occur in the future as a result of Healthwatch work. This can be implied in a provider  response, press release or other source. Implied impact can become tangible impact once change has occurred.
 
Tangible Impact
There is evidence of change that can be directly attributed to Healthwatch work undertaken in the report.