Digital audit of websites and social media accounts for care homes in ShropshireDownload (PDF 1.11MB)
Summary of report contentHealthwatch Shropshire conducted research into websites and social media accounts for Care Homes in Shropshire. They investigated 120 care homes' online presence, to ensure that all potential residents and their families have all the information they need to be able to make informed choices, including whether to make further enquiries or visit the home.
They found that 20 out of 120 care homes did not have a website although there was often information for those that did not on other sites. 7 websites were not showing the home's current CQC rating. 74 websites had information about their Mission Statement or Philosophy of Care avaliable on their website but only 13 websites gave an indication of fees. 51 had information about meals and 71 had some information about activities.
Healthwatch Shropshire recommends that sample menus and activity schedules on a care home's website can be used to give people an idea of what day to day life may be like at the care home. Also, giving people an idea of fees on the website can make it much easier for people to know if the care home is a suitable option.
Would you like to look at:
Digital audit of websites and social media accounts for care homes in Shropshire
Date of publication
Wednesday, 31 March, 2021
Date evidence capture began
Monday, 1 March, 2021
Date evidence capture finished
Tuesday, 30 March, 2021
Communication between staff and patients
Quality of care
Was the work undertaken at the request of another organisation?
What type of organisation requested the work
Primary research method used
If an Enter and View methodology was applied, was the visit announced or unannounced?
Number of people who shared their views
Does the information include public's views?
Does the information include carer's, friend's or relative's views?
Does the information include staff's views?
Were recommendations made by local Healthwatch in the report?
Does the information contain a response from a provider?
Is there evidence of impact in the report?
Is there evidence of impact external to the report?